Total Value Locked$140,806
TVL by Chain
Ethereum$140,381
Arbitrum$407.17
Polygon$17.67
ZKsync Era$0
Moonbeam$0
The chart plots Active Loans as its own series; it is not part of the TVL above.
Key Metrics
Active Loans$421,609
Protocol Information
ParaSpace is a permissionless universal, cross-margin NFT lending protocol that enables users to collateralize both ERC-721 and ERC-20 assets into a single portfolio to borrow against.
Audits:
Methodology
TVL: TVL includes ERC-20 and ERC-721 tokens that have been supplied as well as ERC-20 tokens that are supplied for lending.View code on GitHubHacks
Date: Mar 17, 2023
Amount: $5m
Classification: Oracle Manipulation
Technique: Spot Price Manipulation
Chains: Ethereum
Language: Solidity
Target Type: NFTfi
Returned Funds: $5m
Competitors
ParaSpace Lending V1 history
TVL is the default DefiLlama definition, which excludes Active Loans. Daily values are UTC snapshots from Dec 2, 2022 to Oct 17, 2026.
All-time high TVL: $163.57m on May 4, 2023. All-time low TVL: $89,259 on Jun 26, 2026.
Daily TVL, Sep 18, 2026 to Oct 17, 2026
| Date | TVL |
|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | $159,319 |
| Sep 19, 2026 | $171,720 |
| Sep 20, 2026 | $168,631 |
| Sep 21, 2026 | $170,586 |
| Sep 22, 2026 | $177,791 |
| Sep 23, 2026 | $183,122 |
| Sep 24, 2026 | $177,672 |
| Sep 25, 2026 | $175,694 |
| Sep 26, 2026 | $175,289 |
| Sep 27, 2026 | $174,256 |
| Sep 28, 2026 | $171,339 |
| Sep 29, 2026 | $171,364 |
| Sep 30, 2026 | $171,795 |
| Oct 1, 2026 | $172,218 |
| Oct 2, 2026 | $171,599 |
| Oct 3, 2026 | $165,299 |
| Oct 4, 2026 | $170,298 |
| Oct 5, 2026 | $170,274 |
| Oct 6, 2026 | $169,105 |
| Oct 7, 2026 | $164,093 |
| Oct 8, 2026 | $157,915 |
| Oct 9, 2026 | $151,344 |
| Oct 10, 2026 | $151,878 |
| Oct 11, 2026 | $148,544 |
| Oct 12, 2026 | $153,630 |
| Oct 13, 2026 | $142,032 |
| Oct 14, 2026 | $147,548 |
| Oct 15, 2026 | $143,583 |
| Oct 16, 2026 | $141,311 |
| Oct 17, 2026 | $141,672 |
TVL at each month end, Nov 2024 to Oct 2026
| Date | TVL |
|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2024 | $716,488 |
| Dec 31, 2024 | $805,472 |
| Jan 31, 2025 | $587,015 |
| Feb 28, 2025 | $412,465 |
| Mar 31, 2025 | $291,326 |
| Apr 30, 2025 | $302,100 |
| May 31, 2025 | $385,349 |
| Jun 30, 2025 | $377,437 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | $621,722 |
| Aug 31, 2025 | $598,770 |
| Sep 30, 2025 | $510,352 |
| Oct 31, 2025 | $218,280 |
| Nov 30, 2025 | $167,226 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | $165,262 |
| Jan 31, 2026 | $151,035 |
| Feb 28, 2026 | $110,459 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | $118,268 |
| Apr 30, 2026 | $127,089 |
| May 31, 2026 | $115,621 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | $92,465 |
| Jul 31, 2026 | $185,249 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | $230,934 |
| Sep 30, 2026 | $171,795 |
| Oct 17, 2026 (latest) | $141,672 |
TVL at each year end, Dec 31, 2022 to Dec 31, 2025
| Date | TVL |
|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2022 | $30.93m |
| Dec 31, 2023 | $8.17m |
| Dec 31, 2024 | $805,472 |
| Dec 31, 2025 | $165,262 |
The .csv export on the chart above downloads every daily value. The same data is in the public API: https://api.llama.fi/protocol/paraspace-lending-v1
Frequently asked questions
What is ParaSpace Lending V1's TVL?
As of Oct 17, 2026, ParaSpace Lending V1 has $140,806 in total value locked. TVL has decreased 11.5% over the past 30 days.
What chains does ParaSpace Lending V1 operate on?
ParaSpace Lending V1 operates on 5 chains: Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, ZKsync Era, and Moonbeam. Ethereum holds the largest share at 99.7%.
How does ParaSpace Lending V1's TVL compare to similar protocols?
Among Lending protocols tracked by DefiLlama, ParaSpace Lending V1 ranks #207 by TVL. The category holds $51.634b across 517 protocols, and ParaSpace Lending V1 accounts for <0.1% of that total. Other leading protocols include Aave V3, WePiggy, Tarot, Impermax V2, Fringe V2, Prime Protocol, Morpho Blue, Compound V3, Venus Core Pool, and Fluid Lending.
How much has been borrowed through ParaSpace Lending V1?
As of Oct 17, 2026, ParaSpace Lending V1 has $421,609 in active loans.
Has ParaSpace Lending V1 ever been exploited?
ParaSpace Lending V1 has 1 recorded security incident. The most recent incident occurred on Mar 17, 2023 and involved $5m. It was classified as Oracle Manipulation.