Ask about Avici · freeKey Metrics
Fees 30d$3,501
Fees 30d by chain
Ethereum$3,501
Fees 7d$419.36
Ethereum$419.36
Fees 24h$3.80
Ethereum$3.80
Cumulative Fees$73,588
Ethereum$73,588
Revenue 30d$3,501
Revenue 30d by chain
Ethereum$3,501
Revenue 7d$419.36
Ethereum$419.36
Revenue 24h$3.80
Ethereum$3.80
Cumulative Revenue$73,588
Ethereum$73,588
Holders Revenue 30d$0
Holders Revenue 30d by chain
Ethereum$0
Holders Revenue 7d$0
Ethereum$0
Holders Revenue 24h$0
Ethereum$0
Cumulative Holders Revenue$0
Ethereum$0
DEX Volume 30d$283,918
DEX Volume 30d by chain
Ethereum$283,918
DEX Volume 7d$33,547
Ethereum$33,547
DEX Volume 24h$304
Ethereum$304
Cumulative DEX Volume$6.44m
Ethereum$6.44m
Market Cap$3.55m
$AVICI Price$0.28
Fully Diluted Valuation$3.55m
$AVICI Volume 24h$3,257
CEX Volume$0
DEX Volume$3,259(100.07% of total)
Total Raised$3.5m
Oct 18, 2025$3.5mRound: Public token sale
Protocol Information
Avici is a crypto-backed card issuer that lets users deposit crypto, open secured Visa cards, and spend through self-custodial credit lines with Apple Pay and Google Pay support.
Methodology
Fees: Includes interchange fees, calculated as 1.25% of Avici card spend.View code on GitHubRevenue: Revenue is the full interchange amount retained by Avici.View code on GitHubHolders Revenue: View code on GitHubDEX Volume: Total USD value of Relay swaps routed through Avici, sourced from the avici.org metrics overview API.View code on GitHubHacks
Date: Aug 28, 2026
Amount: $500,859
Classification: Protocol Logic
Technique: Withdrawal Logic Flaw
A vulnerability in a version of Rain’s Solana card contract used by Avici allowed unauthorized withdrawals from the contract holding users’ card balances. Avici reported that 1,685 users were affected for $500,859.22. The vulnerable contract was subsequently upgraded across all affected programs
Chains: Solana
Language: Rust
Target Type: Crypto Card
Competitors
Avici history
Fees, revenue and holders revenue by UTC calendar month, Dec 2025 to Nov 2026
| Month | Fees | Revenue | Holders revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2025 | $1,172 | $1,172 | $0 |
| Jan 2026 | $9,140 | $9,140 | $0 |
| Feb 2026 | $8,279 | $8,279 | $0 |
| Mar 2026 | $8,719 | $8,719 | $0 |
| Apr 2026 | $9,306 | $9,306 | $0 |
| May 2026 | $10,320 | $10,320 | $0 |
| Jun 2026 | $4,625 | $4,625 | $0 |
| Jul 2026 | $3,779 | $3,779 | $0 |
| Aug 2026 | $8,588 | $8,588 | $0 |
| Sep 2026 | $4,433 | $4,433 | $0 |
| Oct 2026 | $4,477 | $4,477 | $0 |
| Nov 2026 (to date) | $749.36 | $749.36 | $0 |
The .csv export on the chart above downloads every daily value. The same data is in the public API: https://api.llama.fi/protocol/avici
Frequently asked questions
What chains does Avici operate on?
Avici operates on Ethereum.
How much has Avici generated in fees and revenue?
Over the past 30 days, Avici generated $3,501 in fees. Of that, $3,501 was protocol revenue. Based on the trailing year, the annualized rate is $87,490 in fees and $87,490 in revenue.
What is the AVICI token price and valuation?
AVICI is currently trading at $0.28. Its circulating market capitalization is $3.55m, ranking it #2,276. Its fully diluted valuation is $3.55m. Supply currently stands at 12.9m circulating, 12.9m total supply, 12.9m maximum supply.
How has AVICI performed recently?
AVICI is up 15.6% over the past 7 days and up 5.9% over the past 30 days. Its all-time high is $7.56, reached on Nov 26, 2025. The token is currently 96.4% below that level.
How does Avici's TVL compare to similar protocols?
Among Crypto Card Issuer protocols tracked by DefiLlama, Avici ranks #17 by TVL. The category holds $264.7m across 30 protocols, and Avici accounts for 0% of that total. Similar protocols include EtherFi Cash Liquid, Plasma One, Tria Card, MetaMask Card, Gnosis Pay, Solayer Card, Ready Card, Holyheld Card, Exa Card, and Bitget Wallet Card.
How much trading volume does Avici process?
Avici processed $283,918 in DEX volume over the past 30 days.
Has Avici ever been exploited?
Avici has 1 recorded security incident. The most recent incident occurred on Aug 28, 2026 and involved $500,859. It was classified as Protocol Logic.