Logo of Meteora DAMM V2

Meteora DAMM V2(MET)

Total Value Locked$23.52m

TVL by Chain

Solana$23.52m

Key Metrics

Fees 30d$4.9m
Fees 30d by chain

Solana$4.9m

Fees 7d$1.45m

Solana$1.45m

Fees 24h$145,152

Solana$145,152

Cumulative Fees$259.64m

Solana$259.64m

Revenue 30d$942,743
Revenue 30d by chain

Solana$942,743

Revenue 7d$278,715

Solana$278,715

Revenue 24h$28,327

Solana$28,327

Cumulative Revenue$51.97m

Solana$51.97m

Holders Revenue 30d$0
Holders Revenue 30d by chain

Solana$0

Holders Revenue 7d$0

Solana$0

Holders Revenue 24h$0

Solana$0

Cumulative Holders Revenue$0

Solana$0

DEX Volume 30d$332.34m
DEX Volume 30d by chain

Solana$332.34m

DEX Volume 7d$69.47m

Solana$69.47m

DEX Volume 24h$9.94m

Solana$9.94m

Cumulative DEX Volume$46.575b

Solana$46.575b

Loading chart...

Frequently asked questions

What is Meteora DAMM V2's TVL?

Meteora DAMM V2 currently has $23.52m in total value locked. TVL has increased 4.3% over the past 30 days.

What chains does Meteora DAMM V2 operate on?

Meteora DAMM V2 operates on Solana. Solana holds the largest share at 100%.

How much has Meteora DAMM V2 generated in fees and revenue?

Over the past 30 days, Meteora DAMM V2 generated $4.9m in fees. Of that, $942,743 was protocol revenue. Based on the trailing year, the annualized rate is $163.9m in fees and $32.82m in revenue.

How does Meteora DAMM V2's TVL compare to similar protocols?

Among Dexs protocols tracked by DefiLlama, Meteora DAMM V2 ranks #46 by TVL. The category holds $13.606b across 1,924 protocols, and Meteora DAMM V2 accounts for 0.2% of that total. Other leading protocols include Raydium AMM, PumpSwap, PancakeSwap AMM V3, Orca DEX, Sanctum Infinity, Meteora DLMM, THORChain DEX, Meteora DAMM V1, Jupiter Lend DEX, and BisonFi.

How much trading volume does Meteora DAMM V2 process?

Meteora DAMM V2 processed $332.34m in DEX volume over the past 30 days.

Has Meteora DAMM V2 ever been exploited?

Meteora DAMM V2 has 1 recorded security incident. The most recent incident occurred on Jan 17, 2026 and involved $1.5m. It was classified as Social Engineering.