Dashboards

112Views

Chain Revenue

Public

Chain Revenue & Transactions Dashboard

A real-time breakdown of on-chain fee generation, sequencer/validator revenue, and transaction activity across all major blockchains. Chain fees = gross gas/tx fees paid by users. Chain revenue = what the protocol actually retains. Data as of June 11, 2026.

Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…

📊 Revenue Landscape — June 2026

The chain fee rankings reveal a surprising hierarchy. Canton ($60.7M, 30d) leads — the Goldman Sachs/DTCC-affiliated institutional settlement chain, where transaction fees reflect high-value regulated financial transactions. Tron ($31.3M, +3% MoM) holds steady at #2, driven entirely by USDT transfer volume — and uniquely, Tron converts 100% of fees into chain revenue.

Ethereum ($13.5M, -54% MoM) has seen a sharp decline, reflecting post-Dencun blob fee compression and continued user migration to rollups. Yet Ethereum's app ecosystem still generates $200M in 30d app fees — the gap between chain fees and app fees is the widest of any blockchain. Solana ($12.5M, -17% MoM) follows a similar pattern.

The standout movers: Base is up +103% MoM ($5.5M) — Coinbase's L2 retains ~99.8% of its sequencer fees and is accelerating. Hyperliquid L1 surged +430% MoM ($1.2M), driven by explosive derivatives trading volume. Revenue retention varies dramatically: Ethereum keeps only ~29% of gross fees (validators take the rest); Solana retains ~13%; but Tron, Base, Canton, and Hyperliquid all keep near 100%.

Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…

Chain Revenue: What Protocols Actually Keep

Chain revenue strips out the validator/miner share and shows what the protocol itself retains. Ethereum revenue ($3.9M, 30d) is just 29% of its gross fees — EIP-1559 burns the base fee but validators capture priority fees. Solana retains only ~13% ($1.6M). Base retains nearly all sequencer revenue ($5.5M ≈ fees), flowing entirely to Coinbase. Hyperliquid L1 keeps 100% of its fees ($1.2M), making it the most capital-efficient L1 among fast-growing chains.

Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…

Transaction Volume

Transaction counts tell a different story from fee revenue. High-throughput chains like Solana and BSC process orders of magnitude more transactions than Ethereum mainnet — but at far lower per-tx costs. Ethereum's lower tx volume commands premium fees per transaction, while L2s like Base are rapidly closing the throughput gap.

Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…
Loading card…