Key Metrics
Fees 30d$62.76m
Fees 30d by chain
Solana$62.76m
Fees 7d$12.63m
Solana$12.63m
Fees 24h$1.85m
Solana$1.85m
Cumulative Fees$1.307b
Solana$1.307b
Revenue 30d$45.53m
Revenue 30d by chain
Solana$45.53m
Revenue 7d$9.11m
Solana$9.11m
Revenue 24h$1.33m
Solana$1.33m
Cumulative Revenue$1.183b
Solana$1.183b
Holders Revenue 30d$29.33m
Holders Revenue 30d by chain
Solana$29.33m
Holders Revenue 7d$5.31m
Solana$5.31m
Holders Revenue 24h$778,173
Solana$778,173
Cumulative Holders Revenue$458.72m
Solana$458.72m
DEX Volume 30d$4.723b
DEX Volume 30d by chain
Solana$4.723b
DEX Volume 7d$945.47m
Solana$945.47m
DEX Volume 24h$140.44m
Solana$140.44m
Cumulative DEX Volume$103.261b
Solana$103.261b
Total Raised$1b
Jul 12, 2025$400mRound: Private token sale
Jul 12, 2025$600mRound: ICO
Protocol Information
Launch a coin that is instantly tradeable in one click for free
Methodology
Fees: Bonding-curve trade fees paid by users (pump's slice + creator/cashback slice), graduation fees, Mayhem-mode fees, and the Platform Fee on pump.fun web and mobile app trades.View code on GitHubRevenue: Pump's slice of the bonding-curve trade fee plus graduation fees, Mayhem-mode fees and the Platform Fee.View code on GitHubHolders Revenue: PUMP bought back on the market by pump.fun buyback wallets (funded by all pump products, so it won't sum exactly with ProtocolRevenue here).View code on GitHubDEX Volume: Quote-asset side of every trade on pump.fun bonding curves: SOL, or the Custom Pair quote asset (USDC, tokenized stocks, WBTC, PUMP, other pump.fun coins, ...) since May 2026, priced by DefiLlama.View code on GitHubUser Activity
Active Addresses (24h)158,957
Transactions (24h)4.29m
Hacks
Date: May 16, 2024
Amount: $1.9m
Classification: Key Compromise
Technique: Private Key Compromised
Chains: Solana
Language: Rust/Anchor
Target Type: DeFi Protocol
Competitors
pump.fun history
Fees, revenue and holders revenue by UTC calendar month, Nov 2024 to Oct 2026
| Month | Fees | Revenue | Holders revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2024 | $93.88m | $93.88m | - |
| Dec 2024 | $82.94m | $82.94m | - |
| Jan 2025 | $149.8m | $149.8m | $0 |
| Feb 2025 | $73.61m | $73.61m | $0 |
| Mar 2025 | $40.4m | $40.4m | $0 |
| Apr 2025 | $49.57m | $49.57m | $0 |
| May 2025 | $52.42m | $52.03m | $0 |
| Jun 2025 | $42.22m | $41.2m | $0 |
| Jul 2025 | $18.23m | $17.47m | $22.24m |
| Aug 2025 | $43.28m | $41.11m | $45.1m |
| Sep 2025 | $50.24m | $43.18m | $56.02m |
| Oct 2025 | $37.32m | $28.36m | $37.51m |
| Nov 2025 | $31.59m | $24.06m | $33.7m |
| Dec 2025 | $30.9m | $23.51m | $32.7m |
| Jan 2026 | $41.88m | $31.85m | $31.76m |
| Feb 2026 | $33.72m | $25.64m | $25.59m |
| Mar 2026 | $32.69m | $24.95m | $25.67m |
| Apr 2026 | $24.66m | $21.35m | $27.61m |
| May 2026 | $30.94m | $23.67m | $16.21m |
| Jun 2026 | $23.62m | $18.1m | $12.08m |
| Jul 2026 | $28.41m | $21.76m | $15.69m |
| Aug 2026 | $47.98m | $36.66m | $27.14m |
| Sep 2026 | $46.41m | $33.06m | $23.64m |
| Oct 2026 (to date) | $56.36m | $40.88m | $26.06m |
The .csv export on the chart above downloads every daily value. The same data is in the public API: https://api.llama.fi/protocol/pump.fun
Frequently asked questions
What chains does pump.fun operate on?
pump.fun operates on Solana.
How much has pump.fun generated in fees and revenue?
Over the past 30 days, pump.fun generated $62.76m in fees. Of that, $45.53m was protocol revenue. Based on the trailing year, the annualized rate is $434.67m in fees and $329.71m in revenue.
How does pump.fun's TVL compare to similar protocols?
Among Launchpad protocols tracked by DefiLlama, pump.fun ranks #186 by TVL. The category holds $239.72m across 333 protocols, and pump.fun accounts for 0% of that total. Similar protocols include Rise.rich, Flipcash, Anoncoin, Token Mill, basedbid, keep.coffee, boop.fun, DumpFlow, Streamlock, and NOTCH.
How much trading volume does pump.fun process?
pump.fun processed $4.723b in DEX volume over the past 30 days.
Has pump.fun ever been exploited?
pump.fun has 1 recorded security incident. The most recent incident occurred on May 16, 2024 and involved $1.9m. It was classified as Key Compromise.