funding rate comps
Public
By ryan18Views
Perp Funding Rate Comparison — ETH, BTC, SOL, XRP, HYPE, AAVE, CRV
Live annualized perpetual funding rates across Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Hyperliquid as of 2026-07-20. CRV and HYPE show the richest annualized carry (~9-11%), while AAVE is a standout negative-carry outlier — Bybit's AAVE perp printed -47% annualized funding, dragging its cross-exchange average to -10.9%, the only negative reading in the set. This divergence signals crowded short positioning on AAVE relative to the broadly long-skewed majors.
This chart needs to be regenerated
The dashboard slot is preserved so the owner can replace it.
Cross-Exchange Breakdown
Funding rates diverge meaningfully by venue — the same token can show a positive rate on one exchange and negative on another within the same hour, reflecting localized positioning imbalances rather than a market-wide consensus.
This chart needs to be regenerated
The dashboard slot is preserved so the owner can replace it.
This chart needs to be regenerated
The dashboard slot is preserved so the owner can replace it.
Market Context
Derivatives positioning is running hot on majors: a Hyperliquid whale briefly ran a 40x, ~1,897 BTC long before fully de-risking on 2026-07-20, while a separate whale opened a 20x leveraged long on 12,000 ETH — flows that push funding positive as longs pay to hold. On ETH, published long/short ratio reads near 0.96 (not fully one-sided) even as funding stays positive, and futures volume was reported up sharply over 24h — consistent with crowded-but-not-extreme long positioning. Context per CryptoBriefing, CryptoSlate, Invezz — unverified, not DefiLlama data.