## Gamified Mining — 180-Day Sector Growth Trajectory
Tracking TVL, fees, and active protocol count across the gamified-mining category. The sector remains niche and consolidated: protocol count grew from just 1 active protocol in early January 2026 to a peak of 14 by June, though listings are new and market caps thin. Recent news flow (BeMine's gamified campaigns, Telegram mini-app launches like Lucky Hand Mining Game) shows the category leaning on gamification layered atop cloud/ASIC mining rather than pure on-chain protocols — a narrative-to-TVL disconnect worth watching.

Gamified Mining TVL (180D)

Gamified Mining Fees (180D, weekly)

Active Protocol Count (180D)

Top Protocols with TVL

Holder's Revenue Distribution

## Fee-to-Incentive Tiering (Organic Growth Ratio)
Ranks each protocol's 30-day fees against 30-day token incentive spend. A ratio above 1x means fees exceed incentive payouts (organic-leaning); below 1x means growth is subsidized. Land Bid (365x), GODL protocol (30x), and ZINC (40x) lead on organic fee generation relative to incentives, while the majority of the category's 22 tracked protocols show no ingested incentive data — treat those as unknown rather than zero-incentive.

| # | Protocol | 30d Fees | 30d Incentives | Fee/Incentive Ratio | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZINC | $6,234,747 | $156,297 | 39.89x | Tier 1: Highly Organic (≥20x) |
| 2 | ORE Protocol | $2,903,024 | $224,779 | 12.91x | Tier 2: Organic (5-20x) |
| 3 | GODL protocol | $839,483 | $28,163 | 29.81x | Tier 1: Highly Organic (≥20x) |
| 4 | ClaimRush | $361,426 | $29,515 | 12.25x | Tier 2: Organic (5-20x) |
| 5 | MineBean | $337,025 | $19,628 | 17.17x | Tier 2: Organic (5-20x) |
| 6 | Jade | $29,467 | $2,248 | 13.11x | Tier 2: Organic (5-20x) |
| 7 | Land Bid | $29,081 | $80 | 364.97x | Tier 1: Highly Organic (≥20x) |
| 8 | Yeet BGT Auction | $14,570 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 9 | Mercury | $14,046 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 10 | FAITH Protocol | $795 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 11 | NICKEL | $137 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 12 | MineBTC | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 13 | AUR Protocol | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 14 | Dune Protocol | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 15 | COAL | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 16 | CHOPCORP | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 17 | Macaron.bid | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 18 | WELEPHANT | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 19 | MineLoot | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 20 | Pizza City | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 21 | Megamine | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |
| 22 | ZORB | $0 | n/a | n/a | No incentive data |


Active Protocols by 30d Fees

Gamified Mining is becoming one of crypto’s most interesting distribution experiments. This dashboard tracks the protocols leading the meta

TVL Comparison

Fees Comparison

Revenue Comparison

Median APY Comparison

GRVT (pronounced "gravity") is the world's first hybrid self-custodial derivatives exchange, 
built on the zkSync ZK Stack. It combines CEX-grade performance with full on-chain custody, giving traders the speed and simplicity of a centralized exchange without ever giving up 
control of their funds.

Traders can access perpetual futures with up to 50× leverage, sub-millisecond order matching, 
and negative maker fee rebates — all while their assets remain self-custodied on-chain. GRVT 
also features a Strategies marketplace where users can invest with vetted on-chain managers.

GRVT bridges the gap between TradFi infrastructure and DeFi self-sovereignty, positioning 
itself as a unified financial system that scales beyond crypto, backed by $19M in Series A 
funding and built for institutional and retail traders alike.

**More info:**
* [Website](https://grvt.io)
* [Twitter](https://x.com/grvt_io)

Project Description

GRVT TVL

GRVT Perps Volume

Perps Volume by Protocol

Top 10 Perps Open Interest

This section compares the open interest and volume of the top 10 protocols in the derivatives category across all chains, providing a broad market overview.

Comparative Analysis

GRVT Perps — Monthly Derivatives Volume

Open Interest — GRVT vs Perp DEX Peers

Mantle has evolved beyond being just another L2. 

It's now positioning itself as a distribution layer bridging TradFi and onchain users.

This dashboard tracks Mantle's chain performance and usage, correlating key metrics to give you a clear picture of network health, adoption trends, and activity patterns over time.

Whether you're evaluating Mantle as a builder, investor, or curious observer, this data will be handy.

Also, here are their socials to stay updated:

• [Telegram](https://t.me/mantlenetwork)
• [Twitter](https://x.com/Mantle_Official)
• [Website](https://group.mantle.xyz/)
•  [Discord](https://discord.com/invite/0xMantle)

*built by [DeFiScholar](https://x.com/ModestusOkoye)*

Mantle L2 Stats → Onchain Edition

*different stats to understand performance and money flow*

Core Metrics

- **Total Volume:** *Focuses on DEX and Aggregator volume to gauge trading volume*
- **Perps Volume:** *Looks at perps platforms on Mantle to measure trading volume*
- **Mantle Revenue:** *Focuses on the revenue accrued by the chain*
- **Mantle Fees:** *Focuses on the fees generated by the chain*

Chain Metrics

Bridge Volume

Total Volume (DEX + DEX Aggregators)

Mantle Perps Volume

Mantle Revenue

Mantle Fees

- **dApps by TVL** *measures token locked valuation across platforms*
- **Holder's Revenue:** *subset of revenue directly distributed to token holders*
- **dApps by Fees:** *Focuses on the fees generated by dApps on Mantle*
- **Supply Side fees:** *a portion of revenue going to service providers like LPs*

Ecosystem Analysis

Top 10 dApps by TVL

Top 10 dApps by Holder's revenue

Top 10 dApps by Fees

Top 10 dApps by Supply Side revenue

Top 10 dApps by User Fees

**Note:** *Clean reserves refer to the component of the Treasury that isn't the native token of the project.*

Treasury Stats

Top 10 dApps by Revenue

Mantle Treasury Composition

Treasury Value: Total vs Clean

*exploring the:*

- TVL
- Stablecoins
- Treasury
- Volume
- DAU

Other L2 Chains Comparison

DEX Volume Market Share

Capital Efficiency (Vol/TVL)

TVL of Emerging vs Established L2s

*comparing $MNT, mETH, cmETH, and COOK*

- *A look at utility, yield opportunity and performance*

Token Analysis

meTH TVL

cmETH TVL

Exploring the Mantle ecosystem through Onchain lens

# Arbitrum vs. Base: The L2 Showdown Crypto Twitter Loves
This dashboard dives into the key performance indicators for Arbitrum and Base, two leading Ethereum Layer 2 solutions. We'll highlight metrics that often spark debate and discussion, from fee generation and revenue to user activity and market dominance.

Core L2 Metrics: TVL, Fees, and Revenue (Weekly)

**Insight: The Battle for Value Capture.** This section reveals how each L2 is performing in terms of Total Value Locked (TVL), the total fees generated by the chain, and the revenue retained by the chain itself. These metrics are crucial for understanding the economic engine of each ecosystem.

User Activity: Active and New Users (Weekly)

**Insight: The Growth Narrative.** User activity metrics are a favorite on Crypto Twitter, indicating adoption and network effects. This chart compares the weekly active and new users, providing a snapshot of which L2 is attracting and retaining more participants.

Bridged TVL: Capital Inflow to L2s (Weekly)

**Insight: Trust and Capital Flow.** Bridged TVL represents the value of assets moved from other chains onto Arbitrum and Base. It's a critical indicator of trust and the willingness of users to commit capital to these L2 ecosystems.

**Arbitrum Token Performance.** As Arbitrum has a native token, ARB, its price and market capitalization are key "sensitive" metrics. Base currently does not have a native token, hence these charts are specific to Arbitrum.

Arbitrum: Top DEX Volume Market Share (Weekly)

Base: Top DEX Volume Market Share (Weekly)

**Insight: The DEX Dominance Game.** Decentralized Exchange (DEX) volume market share is a fiercely debated topic. These charts show which protocols are capturing the most trading activity on each L2, a direct indicator of liquidity and user preference.

This dashboard provides a data-driven look at Arbitrum and Base, focusing on the metrics that drive narratives and discussions within the crypto community. While both L2s show strong performance, their growth trajectories and ecosystem compositions offer distinct points of comparison.

General Overview

Multi-Chart 1

Momentum Fees and Revenue

COMPERATIVE ANALYSIS

Volume Comparison - Top 10 DEX on SUI

Fees Comparison - Top 10 Protocols on SUI

Revenue Comparison - Top 10 Protocols on SUI

*Breakdown of momentum finance performance vs other DEX on Sui network*

Dex-to-Dex Comparison on Sui

Momentum Finance is pioneering a new paradigm for global finance, and here is a comprehensive dashboard that shows their growth trajectory

Base has quickly established itself as one of Ethereum’s leading L2s and one of the first to reach Stage 2. With Perps becoming one of the hottest markets right now, this dashboard is designed to spotlight the underdogs on Base while offering a detailed analysis to guide your view.

The dashboard covers:

- Base Fundamentals (TVL, Volume, Stablecoins)
- Growth Metrics
- Perps Landscape on Base (Volume, TVL)
- Base Perps Vs Other Leading Blockchains
- Competitive Analysis among Base Perps

📊 Dashboard Coverage

*A quick look at the building core metrics of Base blockchain*

🧱 Fundamental Metrics

*A glance at metrics that help to measure the rate at which a blockchain grows*

📈 Growth Metrics

Total Amount Bridged

Base Perps Classification

Top 10 Perps DEX by Volume

Top 10 Perps DEX by TVL

Top 10 Perps DEX by Fees

# Base Perps Volume vs. Leading Blockchains

*This chart provides a direct comparison of perps volume on Base against other leading blockchain platforms, highlighting its relative performance in the derivatives market.*

Base vs Other Blockchains (L1s, L2s and AppChains Inclusive)

Base vs Other L2s

*Comparing the growth metrics of the top 3 leading common protocols by TVL, Volume, and Fees*

Head-To-Head Comparison: Avantis Vs SynFutures V3 Vs RollX

Perps Volume Comparison

Open Interest Comparison

Chain To Chain Mindshare (Avantis is only on Base)

Chain To Chain Comparison (SyncFutures V3)

Chain To Chain Comparison (RollX)

When it comes to perpetuals, Base has quietly climbed into the big leagues.

Right now, it only trails Ethereum and Solana in total volume, holding down about 15% of the entire Perps market. And if you zoom in on L2s, Base isn’t just competing… It’s dominating. Over half of all L2 Perps volume flows through Base, leaving Arbitrum, Optimism, Scroll, and the rest playing catch-up.

But the real story comes when you break it down by protocols.

By TVL: Avantis, RollX, and Derive V2 sit at the top.

By Volume: Avantis, Synfutures V3, and RollX lead the pack.

By Fees: Avantis, Synfutures V3, and Gains Network.

Notice a pattern? No matter how you slice it, Avantis, Synfutures, and RollX keep showing up. These are the engines driving activity on Base.

And when you dig into their growth metrics, one name shines brighter than the rest — Avantis. It’s not just leading, it’s setting the pace for the entire ecosystem.

Observation

A good attempt to illustrate base ecosystem derivatives market

Aster is positioning itself as the Hyperliquid of BNB, and here is a great summary of interesting protocol metrics covering:

 - **Fundamental Metrics** 
- **Protocol Growth Metrics**
- **Comperative analysis**

Fundamental Metrics

TVL comparison

Perps Volume

Open Interest

Perps TVL Comparison (Top 20)

Dashboard to showcase the growth metrics of AsterDEX supported by CZ

This dashboard provides a comprehensive view of Berachain’s performance, showcasing the essential metrics that capture its growth over the past six months since launch.

**Dashboard Sections**
- Fundamental Metrics (TVL, Stablecoins, Revenue, Fees)
- User Adoption and Growth Metrics (Volume, bridged TVL, Stablecoin Inflow)
- Economic Metrics (Bribes Revenue, Revenue, Chain Fees, Fees)
- Ecosystem Highlight (Protocols, Protocol mindshare, Revenue, Fees)
- Competitive Analysis (focused on recently launched chains with $100M+ funding)
- Opportunities on Berachain
- Token metrics

📊 Berachain Ecosystem Dashboard

Berachain Spot Volume (total of native DEX trades + DEX aggregator flows)

TVL bridged into Berachain (sum of assets bridged + volume through bridge aggregators)

Top Protocols by DEX Volume

Top Protocols by Perps Volume

Top Protocols by Fees Generated

Top Protocols accruing Revenue

Berachain 🆚 Story Protocol 🆚 Movement

Stablecoin  MarketCap

Stablecoin Inflows

Chain Volume

Token Price

Market capitalization

*Exploring different opportunities on Berachiain*

Beyond the yields listed here, you can explore every backstop opportunity on Berachain directly at: **https://hub.berachain.com/**

🌱 Berachain Opportunities

Berachain runs on a three-token system:

- **BERA** → Gas + staking token that secures the chain.

- **BGT** → Governance + incentive token for validators and LPs.

- **HONEY** → Stable asset used within the ecosystem.

To really understand how these tokens function, you need to look at Berachain’s Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) mechanism.

Here’s how it works: validators don’t just earn rewards for securing the chain—they are required to share part of those rewards with the dApps their delegators interact with. In turn, the dApps give back incentives to validators, who then pass those incentives down to users. This creates a flywheel where dApps compete to attract more BGT delegations, while users are motivated to delegate where they get the best boost.

An all-in-one dashboard providing a complete overview of Berachain’s on-chain data since launch.

Movement pioneered the first MOVE-based L2 on top of Ethereum, aiming to bring MOVE features to cover for Solidity gaps. Nine months into launch, here is comprehensive data to understudy the chain and ecosystem.

**Dashboard Sections**
- Fundamental Metrics (TVL, Stablecoins, Revenue, Fees)
- User Adoption and Growth Metrics (Volume, Stablecoin Inflow)
- Economic Metrics (Chain Revenue, Chain Fees, Fees)
- Ecosystem Highlight (Protocols, Protocol mindshare, Revenue, Fees)
- Competitive Analysis (focused on ZK-based L2)
- Opportunities on Movement
- Token metrics

📊 Movement Dashboard

Movement Total Volume (Spot Volume + Aggregator flows)

Top 10 Projects by TVL

Top 10 DEX by Volume (Protocols with amplified usage)

Top Projects by Fees

Top Projects earning Revenue

Movement is a MOVE-based L2 with less than 10 months of launch. A great comparison could feature either newly launched chains that raised as much money as Movement did or look at other non-EVM native L2s (E.G, ZK-based L2s).

In this section, we will draw a comparison between **MOVEMENT, STARKNET, AND SCROLL**

⚔️ Comperative Analysis

Volume Comparison

Market Capitalization

*Exploring different opportunities on Berachiain*

🌱 Opportunities on Movement

I made a graphical representation of all major pools on Movement, and you can access it using the link below

`https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qgv9eY2-Ciuacrf1TVdj4_6HKSRQ1MxwEUXLzhBR2cA/edit?usp=sharing `

Ecosytem Opportunities

$MOVE is the native token of Movement Labs used for:

Gas
Incentives
Yields

With Move 2.0, we have staking coming aboard.

*A brief look at the TVL of projects making the weekly cut on Volume*

TVL Metrics

Hyperliquid HLP TVL

GMX V2 TVL

Extended TVL

Derive V2 TVL

dydx v4 TVL

Ostium TVL

GMTrade TVL

Decibel TVL

*Analyzing the profitability of the protocol*

Fees Metrics

dydx V3 TVL

Jupiter Perps Fees

Aster Perps Fees

Ostium Fees

Evedex Fees

GMTrade Fees

Lighter Fees

Extended Fees

GMX V2 Fees

Top 10 Perps by Holder Revenue

Analyzing the various usage of perps based on active positions

Open Interest Metrics

Tradexyz Open Interest

Aster Open Interest

Kalshi Open Interest

Variational Open Interest

Lighter Open Interest

Polymarket Open Interest

EdgeX Open Interest

GRVT Open  Interest

- Most perpetual DEXs with massive volumes are also showing surging TVLs, but I believe that volume alone isn’t a reliable metric for measuring growth.

- A key observation on TVL, though, is that spikes are often driven by incentivized campaigns. That’s where opportunities lie—sorting for projects with TVL between $1M and $10M can help you spot newer Perp protocols worth paying attention to.

- Fees are another strong indicator, since they reveal how much a Perp is actually earning. The next step is to study how its token captures value from those fees.

- Finally, Open Interest stands out as a real signal of user activity. Just note that some platforms like Hyperliquid, Aster, and EdgeX also offer products beyond perps, so OI should be interpreted in context.

DeFiScholar

Top 10 Perps By Performance

Public dashboard library

Gamified Mining

Steakhouse Financial vs 9 competitors

GRVT - The Exchange That Pays You

Mantle L2 - Onchain Stats

Comparison of Ethena USDe, Falcon Finance, Resolv, BounceBit CeDeFi Yield, Superstate USCC, BitFi Basis, Aster USDF, Solv Basis Trading, Solstice USX

Arbitrum vs Base Analysis

Momentum Finance — The OS of global finance

Base Ecosystem Perps Analysis

Aster DEX - The Rising Unicorn on BSC

Berachain Ecosystem Analysis

Movement Ecosytem Analysis